Tuesday, July 13, 2010

The Shack: A Cinderella Self-Publishing Story with a Not-So-Happy Ending

Whenever writers talk about self-publishing, those on the "pro" side of the room usually point to a handful of fantastical success stories: Eragon by Christopher Paolini,  The Christmas Box by Richard Paul Evans, and most recently, The Shack by William Paul Young. But alas, there's not much love left in The Shack.

If you're one of the three people in America who haven't already heard about it, here's a a very quick and simple history of The Shack. William Paul Young wrote it for his kids. He gave copies to friends. They all loved it and said, "You should publish this." He tried. No publisher would touch it. Finally, two pastors, Wayne Jacobsen and Brad Cummings, found out about the book, created Windblown Media, published The Shack, and a star was born. Unfortunately, no contracts were drawn up specifying how the money end of this deal would work. It was all verbal agreements and handshakes. You can see where this is going...

In 2008, after the book had sold about a billion copies, Hachette Book Group got involved and cut a deal to market and distribute The Shack. At that point, contracts were finally signed. But now, several million dollars in royalties later, there is no joy in Shack-ville. You can read the whole sad tale in this Los Angeles Times article, but suffice to say, there's a whole lot of suing going on.

What had become the shining example of how successful a self-published author could be has now transformed into a cautionary tale. The fairy tale has become something of a Greek tragedy. To me, it's just another example of how important it is to have an agent (or at least a lawyer) represent you. Part of the mess going on right now seems to be because these three men signed a standard contract that they did not fully understand. Now that they've taken a closer look at how the money's split, they don't like it. Getting someone who understood contract language involved up front would have eliminated those issues.

I wish everyone in this situation well. While I wasn't wild over The Shack like many of my friends were, I still recognize that it ministered to a lot of people. And now it gives those of us in the publishing industry (and those hoping to break in) a brand new lesson. Sadly, one it never intended to teach

3 comments:

Dr Johns Blogg said...

Hi Jen...

Just read your blogg... I am sad, upset and grieved all at the same time... With a touch of anger as the rotten cherry on top of this emotional sunday...

It makes me think of Mel Gibson's wonderful, "The Passon of the Christ" and then finding Mel a year or so later, drunk in a bar followed by a DUI... While I see Mel as a filmmaker and not a five fold minister (aka Pastor), it was sad to see one so intent of standing for Christ found in such a situation...

To me this is worse! The very things that was written about in the Shack it appears these pastors forgot... As a pastor of 25 years and one with a minisry to ministers for those who don't know me, sadly this is all to common. Some of our favorite ministers and more than you would like to know(on TV and published) are very gifted, but are no more spiritually mature than those graduating their own new believer's class...

I am heart broken... The Shake to me is a prophetic message for our generation about religion vs spiritual reality... One can argue calling this just an attack of the devil... But... As Jesus said, "The prince of this world is coming and will find nothing in Me..." Sadly, many times darkness comes only to reveal the reality that we possess the same spiritual quality...

On the positive note... The content of the Shake is still truly a powerful, revelatory tool, that inspite of our humaness (publishers, friends and business partners) speaks a wealth of biblical truth!

John Mastrogiovanni, D.Min.

Dr Johns Blogg said...

Ooops! Sorry for the typo... I meant SHACK!

:)

Jennifer AlLee said...

John, considering the situation, the "Shake" isn't far off the mark!

I agree, it's a sad, sad thing. And very similar to the Gibson situation. Not the actions themselves, but the result. That the actions of the creators jeapordize the power and message of their art.

Thanks for stopping by and sharing your take. You always offer a fresh new way of looking at things :+}